Impact stories

Examples of engagement and impact activities at LSE

Knowledge exchange can happen with any non-academic audiences, and there are many ways to engage these audiences with your research.

Engagement and impact can happen with any non-academic audiences, and there are many ways to engage these audiences and multiple types of impact you can pursue. While your engagement and impact plans will be uniquely shaped to your project, it can be useful to look at examples to help generate ideas for your own engagement and impact objectives. Here are just some examples of the innovative engagement and impact work taking place across LSE.

For more inspiration, you can also explore LSE’s Impact Case Studies. To discuss the most effective activities for your research, please contact the KEI Integrated Service: research.kei@lse.ac.uk

Policy engagement and impact stories

Legally binding instruments on Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ)

Project Lead

Dr Siva Thambisetty, Associate Professor of Law, LSE Law School

What did the project team do? 

The United Nations has been working to form a legal framework for the protection of marine biodiversity and the fair sharing of its resources. This project aimed to influence negotiations over the ‘‘Treaty on Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction’’, a historic agreement setting out key principles, obligations and processes that states must uphold in the high seas to protect marine life and ensure fair use of marine genetic resources collected in these waters. The project sought to ensure the Treaty would set out how any gains made through discoveries in the high seas would be shared equitably across all nations, rather than solely benefit richer countries.

As the expert on the G77+China Group of Developing Countries, and advisor to the group’s Chair, Cuba, Dr Siva Thambisetty co-authored key briefing documents setting out proposals on marine genetic resources. She redrafted several articles to better reflect G77+China positions, analysed developed country positions in real time, aided informal closed door negotiations on specific issues, coordinated external expert input, and was instrumental in formulating an alternative proposal for monetary benefit-sharing

Working with the research company, One World Analytics, the project also offered a technical solution through a prototype of a batch identifier enabling samples to be identified as coming from areas beyond national jurisdiction. 

What did they achieve?

Proximity to negotiators gave Dr Thambisetty a clear understanding of the nuances, potential sticking points, and wider political pressures that needed to be addressed to reach an agreement. Influenced by the project team’s work, the final Treaty text contained both the principles and processes that would enable equitable sharing of benefits from genetic materials found in the high seas.

The batch identified prototype was accepted and represented a major win for developing countries. The team also pushed to ensure the Treaty established reporting obligations once any publications, patents or products are developed from these genetic resources.

While the Treaty must still be formally ratified, this is the next step towards ensuring the world’s oceans are managed in a sustainable and equitable way. 

 Who were the beneficiaries?

  • Developing countries
  • Supranational organisations
  • National policymakers
  • Environmental bodies

Find out more

Hear more about the project in this video or read the Research for the World article, Protecting the high seas

 

Open and Inclusive: Fair Processes for Financing Universal Health Coverage

Project Lead

Professor Alex Voorhoeve, Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method at LSE

What did the project team do?

Professor Alex Voorhoeve co-authored a new report with staff at the World Bank, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and the Bergen Center for Ethics and Priority Setting in Health, ‘‘Open and Inclusive: Fair Processes for Financing Universal Health Coverage’’. The project aimed to bring the report’s key messages to the attention of leading policymakers in health financing around the world and engage them in a dialogue about the findings and implementation.

The team ran a workshop at the World Bank/USAID/Global Annual Health Financing Forum, one of the largest gatherings of health policy professionals from Lower and Middle-Income Countries as well as donors and international organisations. The workshop aimed to critically discuss findings from the ‘‘Open and Inclusive’’ report, the strengths and weaknesses of the framework, and consider practical ways in which health financing decision processes might be made fairer. The workshop brought together ten speakers from around the world, including senior health policymakers from South Africa, Nigeria, Malawi, and India, and Civil Society representatives from Kenya, as well as academics and senior staff from the World Health Organisation (WHO) and World Bank.

What did they achieve?

The workshop was full beyond capacity and presenters offered in-depth, compelling and inspiring examples of inclusive decision-making. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

  • Health policymakers and professionals
  • International organisations (World Bank, World Health Organisation, and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health)

Find out more

Hear more about the project in this video, and read the Research for the World article, How can we make fair choices on the path to Universal Health Coverage?

 

 Community and citizen engagement and impact stories

Configuring Light

 

Tackling Light Inequalities Tackling Light Inequalities
Tackling Light Inequalities by Configuring Light/Staging the Social LSE

What did the project team do?

The interdisciplinary team explored the role lighting plays in our everyday lives. They collaborated with designers, developers and municipalities, aiming to build a better social knowledge basis for lighting design interventions. The project particularly focused on tackling social inequalities in public lighting, focusing on an urban space in Southwark, London.

The team created a website, a film, a handbook, a report and an exhibition. They held workshops, a training session and a symposium.

Who were the beneficiaries?

  • Local community members
  • Social scientists
  • Lighting design professionals
  • Urban professionals
  • Urban designers
  • Local authority

Find out more

Visit the Configuring Light project website and hear about the project in this video

 

Housing Plus

What did the project team do?

The project used the research expertise in LSE Housing and Communities, and CASE, to develop new thinking and solutions for the complex, interacting problems of housing, poverty, work, community and environment.

The Housing Plus Academy promoted knowledge exchange and participative learning among decision-makers, frontline staff, and tenants of social landlords. It sought to tackle problems affecting both Housing Association and local authority landlords, including benefit cuts, Universal Credit financial pressures, estate regeneration, community enterprise and housing young people.

The team produced a practical guide for practitioners and policymakers, held residential ‘‘think-tank days’’, morning roundtable sessions, and a policy form. They created a Housing Plus Network. 

Who were the beneficiaries? 

  • Businesses and industry
  • Public sector bodies
  • Charities and the third sector 
  • Wider publics
  • Landlords
  • Private and social housing tenants
  • Homeowners
  • Builders and Developers
  • Engineers, architects, construction and energy companies

Find out more

Read more about the Housing Plus scheme

 

Reinventada

What did the project team do?

The project co-produced a 32-minute documentary of the everyday lives of 12 women in Medellín, Colombia, during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-21. Working with the 12 women, researchers and filmmakers in Colombia and the UK, the team developed a pioneering participatory video methodology using participants’ smartphones for filming, editing, online discussion and reflection activities. The film illustrates challenging issues for the women prior to the pandemic, including inequality, poverty and insecurity, and also highlights new insights, such as the importance of gardens for food security and mental health as well as mutual aid activities.

What did they achieve?

The project developed a pioneering participatory video methodology. The project enhanced women’s capacities through long-term skill development – such as learning to use smartphones for filming, joining online activities like Zoom meetings, and send data online. It boosted solidarity networks for the women.

The film was screened at local Medellín events, film festivals, the Royal Geographical Film Geographies conference, and online. Students benefitted from viewing the film and sharing lessons learned in the development of a remote participatory video project. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

  • Migrant women in Medellin, Colombia and the wider local community
  • NGO Con Vivamos
  • Spectacle Training - a participatory video filming company
  • Local policymakers
  • Students and education sector in the UK

Find out more

Hear more about the project in this video or read the Research for the World article, Collaborating in a pandemic: empowering migrant women in Colombia to tell their stories

 

 

Engaging and impacting young people

Adolescents and abortion: Ethiopia, Malawi and Zambia

 

Mwansa's Story: Barriers to contraception and safe abortion in Sub-Saharan Africa Mwansa's Story: Barriers to contraception and safe abortion in Sub-Saharan Africa

Project lead

Professor Ernestina Coast, Department of International Development at LSE

What did the project team do?

The team worked with NGO Ipas and creative agency PostiveNegatives alongside youth champions to co-create animated films and comics that would amplify girls’ voices, reach adolescents, and educate and inform around the legal options for abortion-related care in Ethiopia (Kokeb’s Story), Malawi (Mphatso’s Story) and Zambia (Mwansa’s Story). Made in multiple languages, these films were shared online and through networks on platforms like WhatsApp and YouTube.

What did they achieve?

KEI funding led to a further award from the Medical Research Foundation to continue work with an Africa-focused communications specialist, and using the project outputs to create training for healthcare workers.

Who were the beneficiaries?

  • Adolescents aged 10-19 years in Ethiopia, Malawi and Zambia
  • IPAS, The International Campaign for Women's Rights to Safe Abortion
  • World Health Organisation

Find out more

Watch Mphatso’s Story and Mwansa’s Story on YouTube and read the Research for the World article, Mwansa's story: barriers to contraception and safe abortion in Sub-Saharan Africa

 

 

Public engagement

Global Kids Online

 

Presenting Research Findings to Children Presenting Research Findings to Children
Presenting Research Findings to Children, EU Kids Online James Rattee, LSE

Project lead

Professor Sonia Livingstone, Department of Media and Communications at LSE

What did the project team do?

This international research team generated a rigorous cross-national evidence base around children’s use of the internet. They created a global network of researchers and experts. They produced best practice training and a toolkit, policy and practice briefs, child-friendly resources developed with children to promote digital citizenship, and resources for parents and teachers. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

  • UNICEF
  • UN Committee on the Rights of the Child
  • Internet Governance Forum
  • World Summit on the Information Society
  • International Telecommunications Union
  • Parents
  • Children
  • Teachers

Find out more

Visit the project website.

 

Timeless

 

Timeless Timeless
Timeless The Liminal Space

Project lead 

Professor Emily Jackson, LSE Law School

What did the project team do?

The project team worked with the design consultancy The Liminal Space to create a fictional beauty brand, ‘‘Timeless’’, to inform and engage women in thinking about their options around social egg freezing and fertility. They held a pop-up shop in London which looked like a typical high-end beauty store, with assistants standing behind displays of a stylish new product range of “face creams”, “perfumes” and “serums” with names like “Promotion or Procreation”, “Mr Wrong” and “Mr Right not Mr Ready”. Amanda Gore of The Liminal Space said: “The product ranges were designed to help people access the information easily. We wanted the perfumes to bring a level of humour and then deepen the engagement through the facts each one detailed.’’ The project team also held a programme of interactive workshops, graphic visualisations, talks and exhibitions. They also made two short films, a website and produced media articles and engagement.

What did they achieve?

The project raised public debate on how these advances in biomedical science may impact the world of work, relationships and wider society.  In the six days that Timeless was open, 1,200 people visited the shop, and a further 5,000 visited the shop’s website. It also attracted media coverage across print, online, television and radio, was viewed online by 335,000 people and shared over 2,500 times on social media. The collective reach of the print media was over 800,000, the combined TV and print reach was 11.8 million and the radio reach was 4.2 million listeners. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

  • Media
  • Students
  • Researchers
  • Wider publics

Find out more

Hear more about the project in this video and read the Research for the World article, Taking the pressure off: giving women time to start a family. Read Emily Jackson’s REF 2021 Impact Case Study featuring the Timeless project. 

 

Digital engagement and impact stories

Climate Change Laws of the World database

What did the project team do?

The team produced The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment’s Climate Change Laws of the World database, the world’s largest database covering climate change-related legislation and policy. Analytical and comparative tools make the data accessible to a broad non-academic audience.

Who were the beneficiaries?

  • World Resources Institute
  • Policymakers, parliamentarians, negotiators (globally)
  • International organisations e.g. UNFCCC, UNEP, Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), International Energy Agency (IEA)
  • Institutional investors (e.g. pension funds) and green investment initiatives (e.g. the Transition Pathway Initiative, Climate Action 100+) (globally)
  • Civil society, including media; NGOs; the general public (globally)

Find out more

Explore the database. Read the Grantham Research Institute’s REF 2021 Impact Case Study featuring the Climate Change Laws of the World database

 

Almanac of Electoral Ergonomics

What did the project team do?

The team created an online database showcasing electoral data for every democracy in the world. It is based on the concept of ‘‘electoral ergonomics’’ – the idea that all aspects of electoral design (such as the format of ballot papers) affect voter satisfaction, turnout and electoral choice.

The almanac features information regarding ‘‘effective access to the vote’’, bringing together all aspects of registration and accessibility into one measure as a key metric of the quality of electoral democracy across systems. It highlights examples of best practice and is fully searchable by country, category and instruments with significant interactive content.

What did they achieve?

The database has become an important resource for practitioners working in the field of electoral management. The aim is to improve the quality of electoral democracy by providing decision-makers and influencers with research-based knowledge and understanding of how electoral design and procedures affect attitudes, turnout, electoral choice, particularly among under-represented groups. 

Who were the beneficiaries?

  • Election management bodies (international)
  • Commonwealth parliamentary association
  • International organisations and NGOs including European Commission, Committee of the Regions, Counterpoint, Open Society, European Youth Forum, Electoral Stakeholders Network, International Centre for Parliamentary Studies
  • Citizens, particularly first time voters, disabled voters, vulnerable minorities

Find out more

Explore the database