Annual course guide review

 

Modifications to existing optional courses can be considered by Department Teaching Committees (DTCs) at any stage during the academic year before the year in which the course will be taught. Modifications to core or semi-core courses can also be considered by DTCs, but may require a longer lead-in time before changes can be implemented. See Modifications to existing courses and programmes for more information. In addition, TQARO conducts a targeted annual course guide review, which usually closes in mid-Summer Term. 

Using CAPIS (the Course And Programme Information System), a bespoke web-based data management system, the annual review of course information is carried out online. Edits to course details can be made directly in CAPIS by staff from academic departments during Lent Term and Summer Term once CAPIS has been rolled forward to the next academic year (a process whereby a copy of all course information is produced to enable edits to be made by departmental staff for the following academic session). TQARO will advise departments about the timing of the CAPIS roll forward each year.

Further information

Department approval during the annual review process

Departmental approval enables academic departments to review edits made to course guides by their staff, prior to submission to TQARO.

A CAPIS Manager can ‘switch on’ department approval, so that appointed staff members can double-check and approve edited course guides before they are submitted. The approval stage comes after edits have been made and the course guide has been submitted for approval by the editor.

Settings in CAPIS can be selected so that approval is required for:

  • courses with minor changes; and/or
  • courses with major changes; or
  • all courses within a department, including those with no changes.

CAPIS Managers are default approvers, but additional approvers can be set up as required.

Instructions for staff

CAPIS managers should read managing department approval settings for the annual review (PDF) for detailed instructions about how to amend departmental approval settings, including details on how to assign the ‘approver’ role to colleagues.

CAPIS managers should read approving course guides using CAPIS (PDF) for detailed instructions about how to approve edited course guides.

Important: We would recommend that department approval settings are updated in CAPIS before instruction is given to colleagues to start reviewing and updating course information.

Reviewing and amending UG, PGT and PGR course guides

The annual course guide review using CAPIS takes place each year in preparation for the following academic session. Academic and/or administrative staff are responsible for reviewing specific courses or sets of courses.

  • All UG, PGT and PGR course guides must be reviewed and submitted to TQARO via CAPIS via the annual review process.
  • Even if no amendments are required to a course guide, the staff member responsible for it will still need to perform the annual review and submit it using CAPIS.

Instructions for staff

Academic staff, CAPIS managers and editors should click here for detailed instructions (PDF) about how to ‘perform the annual review’ for UG, PGT and PGR course guides.

Please note the following:

  • If changes to teaching allocations will occur between one academic session and the next, administrative staff should ensure that the correct teacher is listed in the course guide in CAPIS before asking academic staff to edit the course information. This is so that staff have access to the guide in CAPIS.


To update staff listings for specific courses enter in to the course details via the option to ‘see the list of existing courses and proposals’ on the CAPIShomepage. Select the ‘Add co-proposer or editor’ option from the Actions  menu and amend the user list as appropriate.

  • Following the introduction of the School’s devolved quality assurance framework in 2018/19, all standard modifications to existing courses will now rest with departments, either via DTC approval for major changes or with no formal approval (DTC oversight only) for most minor changes. Please see Sections 11-16 of the Quality Assurance Handbook for more information. 

    Modifications to the following sections of the course guide will still require a rationale to be supplied as part of the review process, for reporting purposes: course availability, teaching and summative assessment.

 If you have any questions about the above information, please submit them to ard.capis@lse.ac.uk.