There are several techniques you can use to encourage students to ask questions and to open up discussion. The most obvious is to draw on students’ questions and comments and to expand upon them with your own remarks. You may want to jot down several statements or questions beforehand and use these as a springboard.
For example, you may want to plan out a sequence of short questions aimed at helping students work their way through a particular concept, theory or model. If you can anticipate problems that students will have (either through your own learning experience, or the teaching experience of you and your peers) you might wish to devise questions that can help students explore these ideas further.
When calling upon students, an approach favoured by many teachers is simply to ask questions to the class as a whole and let whoever wishes to respond. However, this can often lead to certain students dominating the class discussion, which in turn can encourage other students to simply rely on such students, rather than making their own contributions. To mitigate against this, an approach used by some teachers is to go round the class in an easily predictable, or explicitly stated, pattern so students know when their turn to answer is approaching and can prepare. Other teachers take a more random approach, calling on people by name. This form of cold calling can be unsettling for not only students but teachers as well; however, when done transparently and in a way which emphasises that it is not a punishment or being “picked on” to be called upon, cold calling can increase both the number of students volunteering responses in class, as well as the number of their contributions.
There are of course several factors that make students apprehensive about contributing in class, and it is important to understand your students to understand what both motivates and demotivates their participation in class. In some educational climates, student participation and questioning are actively promoted and developed; however, this may not always lead to constructive or helpful contributions. In other climates, this may be perceived as a sign of disrespect from students and thus discouraged (either overtly or intrinsically); however, this does not mean necessarily mean such students are passive and uncritical in their learning. Think about how you can communicate the purpose and benefit of your desired approach and talk this through with your students at the start of the course.
If you choose to use a direct questioning approach it is also sensible to think through what you will do when a student cannot answer your question or gives a muddled or an incorrect response. It is likely to fall to the teacher to “rescue” the situation and help re-build the confidence of an embarrassed or flustered student. Because of these potential difficulties it is, therefore, suggested that you do not ask individual students to answer your questions so directly until you have established a good rapport with your class and you have got to know your students better.
Inevitably, students will make errors in class, and the fear of doing so ‘publicly’ can be a major demotivator for volunteering responses. A powerful technique you can employ to destigmatise errors is to frame them more positively. Errors are indeed learning opportunities for students, and it is perhaps preferable that any errors they make are done so in the principle space of a classroom rather than, say, the impartial context of a summative assessment.
With more discursive subjects, it is generally preferable to open up discussion with open-ended questions which will get students thinking about relationships, applications, consequences, and contingencies, rather than merely the basic facts. Open questions often begin with words like “how” and “why” rather than “who”, “where” and “when”, which are more likely to elicit short factual answers and stifle the flow of the discussion. This more closed questioning approach tends to set up a “teacher/student” “question/answer” routine that does not lead into fruitful discussion of underlying issues. You will want to ask your students the sorts of questions that will draw them out and actively involve them, and you will also want to encourage your students to ask questions of one another. Again it is for you to decide whether to call on students directly or leave the discussion and discussant “open”. Above all, you must convey to your students that their ideas are welcomed as well as valued.
Very occasionally you may have a student in your class who experiences more than the normal level of anxiety or shyness when called upon to contribute to the class discussions or to present their work. Treat such situations with sensitivity and if appropriate seek specialist guidance from the Disability and Wellbeing Service, Eden Centre or the Language Centre.
There are several pitfalls in asking questions in class. Here are the four most common ones:
- Phrasing a question so that your implicit message is, “I know something you don’t know and you’ll look stupid if you don’t guess what’s in my head!”
- Constantly rephrasing student answers to “fit” your answer without actually considering the answer that they have given
- Phrasing a question at a level of abstraction inappropriate for the level of the class – questions are often best when phrased as problems that are meaningful to the students
- Not waiting long enough to give students a chance to think.
The issue of comfortable “thinking time” is an often-ignored component of questioning techniques. If you are too eager to impart your views, students will get the message that you’re not really interested in their opinions. Most teachers tend not to wait long enough between questions or before answering their own questions because a silent class induces too much anxiety for the class teacher. It can be stressful if you pick on a student for an answer and all the group are waiting for a reply. Many students, particularly those with certain disabilities or dyslexia, students who are not confident in speaking in public, speaking English, or in the subject matter may become flustered in such a situation. Creating a more comfortable space in which to think is likely to induce a better “quality” of answer and increase the opportunities for all students to contribute effectively. Consider ways to create this space in your class following a question. For example, giving students an explicit time span to think about a question is not only a prompt that they do need to think, but can convey the level of cognitive engagement required of the task: 30 seconds suggests a very simple task, while 2-3 minutes indicates a more demanding activity.
Once the students have confidence that you will give them time to think their responses through, and you show them that you really do want to hear their views, they will participate more freely in future.
Asking students questions about work that they have not done is clearly a different issue from those noted above and comes back to issues around agreeing ground rules with students to ensure that they prepare adequately for class. It is important to agree on working patterns from the start and follow them through.